Determinants of Cesarean Section Decision-Making Beyond Clinical Indications: A Qualitative Study

https://doi.org/10.53770/amhj.v6i1.807

Penulis

  • Aprilia Wulandari Faculty of Health, Qamarul Huda Badaruddin Bagu University, Central Lombok Regency, West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia and Department of Midwifery, Mataram Health Polytechnic, Mataram, West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia
  • Sastrawan Sastrawan Faculty of Health, Qamarul Huda Badaruddin Bagu University, Central Lombok Regency, West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia
  • Sismulyanto Sismulyanto Faculty of Health, Qamarul Huda Badaruddin Bagu University, Central Lombok Regency, West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia

Abstrak

Cesarean section (CS) rates have increased substantially worldwide, with a growing proportion performed without clear medical indications, raising concerns about avoidable maternal and neonatal risks, healthcare costs, and health system inefficiencies. In Mataram City, Indonesia, hospital-based CS rates exceed 60%, substantially higher than national levels and international recommendations, yet evidence regarding the decision-making processes underlying this pattern remains limited. This study aimed to explore how clinical, sociocultural, and health system factors interact to shape CS decision-making in Mataram City. A qualitative case study was conducted from June to August 2025 using in-depth interviews with women who voluntarily chose CS without emergency indications, obstetricians, and nursing staff, as well as focus group discussions with midwives recruited purposively from public and private healthcare settings. Data were analyzed thematically using the Health Belief Model as an analytical framework. Five interrelated domains shaped CS decision-making: medical considerations, maternal and family perceptions, social interactions, healthcare provider authority, and childbirth financing mechanisms. Relative medical indications emerged as critical triggers that legitimized maternal preferences for CS by amplifying perceived risks within asymmetrical patient provider relationships. Overall, CS decision-making was shaped by the interaction of clinical assessments, sociocultural norms, provider authority, and health system financing. Strengthening shared decision-making, standardizing antenatal counseling, improving maternal health literacy, and addressing financial incentives may help reduce unnecessary CS while preserving maternal autonomy and ensuring maternal and neonatal safety.  

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Referensi

Angolile, C. M., Max, B. L., Mushemba, J., & Mashauri, H. L. (2023). Global increased cesarean section rates and public health implications: A call to action. Health science reports, 6(5), e1274. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1274

Belladiena, A. N., Ashari, A., Kusumawati, N., Wibowo, S. S., Wulandari, F., Hadi, H. P., & Setiawan, A. (2025). Determining factors in choosing a caesarean section: the role of health financing and availability of health facilities in Indonesia. International Journal Of Health Science, 5(3), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.55606/ijhs.v5i3.6081

Betran, A. P., Moller, A. B., Zhang, J., Gulmezoglu, A. M., & Torloni, M. R. (2016). The increasing rate of caesarean sections: global, regional and national estimates. PloS One, 11(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148343

Badan Kebijakan Pembangunan Kesehatan. (2024). Survey Kesehatan Indonesia (SKI) dalam angka Tahun 2023. https://www.badankebijakan.kemkes.go.id/hasil-ski-2023/

Colomar, M., Opiyo, N., Kingdon, C., Long, Q., Nion, S., Bohren, M. A., & Betran, A. P. (2021). Do women prefer caesarean sections? A qualitative evidence synthesis of their views and experiences. PLoS ONE, 16(5), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251072

Cruickshank, M. D., Robertson, C., Brazzelli, M. G., Ekong, A. I., Ade, M., Hull, P. M., ... & Black, M. E. (2025). What are the influences on women’s preferences and decision-making when planning mode of birth in high-income countries? A qualitative systematic review. AJOG Global Reports, 5(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100556

De Angelis, M. M., Cooper, M., McNeill, M. L., & Briley, A. (2023). Media influences on primiparous women's mode of birth choice. Women and Birth, 36, S24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2023.07.063

Deng, R., Tang, X., Liu, J., Gao, Y., & Zhong, X. (2021). Cesarean delivery on maternal request and its influencing factors in Chongqing, China. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 21(1), 384. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03866-7

Eide, K. T., & Bærøe, K. (2021). How to reach trustworthy decisions for caesarean sections on maternal request: A call for beneficial power. Journal of Medical Ethics, 47(12), E45. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106071

Etcheverry, C., Betrán, A. P., de Loenzien, M., Robson, M., Kaboré, C., Lumbiganon, P., ... & Dumont, A. (2024). How does hospital organisation influence the use of caesarean sections in low-and middle-income countries? A cross-sectional survey in Argentina, Burkina Faso, Thailand and Vietnam for the QUALI-DEC project. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 24(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06257-w

Gebeyehu, N. A., Gelaw, K. A., Lake, E. A., Adela, G. A., Tegegne, K. D., & Shewangashaw, N. E. (2022). Women decision-making autonomy on maternal health service and associated factors in low-and middle-income countries: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Women's Health, 18, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057221122618

Green, E. C., Murphy, E. M., & Gryboski, K. (2020). The health belief model. The Wiley encyclopedia of health psychology, 211-214. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119057840.ch68

Hadizadeh-Talasaz, F., Ghoreyshi, F., Mohammadzadeh, F., & Rahmani, R. (2021). Effect of shared decision making on mode of delivery and decisional conflict and regret in pregnant women with previous cesarean section: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03615-w

Kitaw, T. M., Limenh, S. K., Chekole, F. A., Getie, S. A., Gemeda, B. N., & Engda, A. S. (2021). Decision to delivery interval and associated factors for emergency cesarean section: a cross-sectional study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 21(1), 224. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03706-8

Laurita Longo, V., Odjidja, E. N., Beia, T. K., Neri, M., Kielmann, K., Gittardi, I., ... & Lanzone, A. (2020). “An unnecessary cut?” multilevel health systems analysis of drivers of caesarean sections rates in Italy: a systematic review. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 20(1), 770. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03462-1

Leta, M., Assefa, N., & Tefera, M. (2022). Obstetric emergencies and adverse maternal-perinatal outcomes in Ethiopia; A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Global Women's Health, 3, 942668. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2022.942668

Loke, A. Y., Davies, L., & Mak, Y. W. (2019). Is it the decision of women to choose a cesarean section as the mode of birth? A review of literature on the views of stakeholders. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 19(1), 286. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2440-2

Miller, Y. D., & Danoy-Monet, M. (2021). Reproducing fear: the effect of birth stories on nulligravid women’s birth preferences. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21(1), 451. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03944-w

Octavia, E. N. (2020). Hubungan Tenaga Pemeriksa Kehamilan dan Kepemilikan Jaminan Kesehatan terhadap Pemilihan Metode Persalinan Sesar di Indonesia (Analisis Data SDKI Tahun 2012 dan 2017). Universitas Indonesia.

Pahleviannur, M., De Grave, A., Saputra, D., Mardianto, D., Sinthania, D., Hafrida, L., ... & Mahardhani, A. (2022). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Sukoharjo: Pradina Pustaka Grup. https://osf.io/preprints/thesiscommons/jhxuw

PP POGI. (2022). Seksio Sesarea, Panduan Klinis. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362966835

Probst, M. A., Kanzaria, H. K., Schoenfeld, E. M., Menchine, M. D., Breslin, M., Walsh, C., Melnick, E. R., & Hess, E. P. (2017). Shared Decisionmaking in the Emergency Department: A Guiding Framework for Clinicians. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 70(5), 688–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.03.063

RSUD Kota Mataram. (2025). Laporan Persalinan Ruang Bersalin RSUD Kota Mataram Tahun 2022-2024.

Shawaar, D. E., Tanveer, Z., Sheikh, I., Sulehri, S. A., & Batool, H. (2023). Socio-demographic, Obstetric and Non-obstetric Factors Influencing the Incidence of Cesarean Section (C-section). Pak-Euro Journal of Medical and Life Sciences, 6(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.31580/pjmls.v5i2.2502

Sinaga, D. I. (2022). Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Persalinan Sectio Caesarea di Rumah Sakit Colombia Asia Medan Tahun 2020. Institut Kesehatan Helvetia.

WHO. (2018). WHO recommendations non-clinical interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections. https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/a38c497e-0617-4e5d-a950-7328926372fb/content

World Health Organization. (2021). Caesarean section rates continue to rise, amid growing inequalities in access. https://www.who.int/news/item/16-06-2021-caesarean-section-rates-continue-to-rise-amid-growing-inequalities-in-access

Yussuph, Z. H., & Alwy Al-Beity, F. M. (2023). Shared decision making on mode of delivery following a prior cesarean delivery in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. PLoS ONE, 18(10), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291809

Zuchri, A. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Makassar: Syakir Media Press.

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2026-06-30

Cara Mengutip

Wulandari, A., Sastrawan, S., & Sismulyanto, S. (2026). Determinants of Cesarean Section Decision-Making Beyond Clinical Indications: A Qualitative Study. Ahmar Metastasis Health Journal, 6(1), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.53770/amhj.v6i1.807

Terbitan

Vol 6 No 1 (2026): Ahmar Metastasis Health Journal

Bagian

Original Research

Lisensi

Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Ahmar Metastasis Health Journal

Creative Commons License

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.